By Rob Janicki
The White House, in
conducting a prisoner exchange of the five highest risk Taliban prisoners for
one American soldier in Taliban custody in Afghanistan, is coming up against a
violation of law.
The White House has a complete staff of advisers
to make certain that there are no "Oops!" moments. Is it
logical or reasonable to believe that the entire White House staff of advisers
could have had a singular moment of mass amnesia in forgetting the law that
demands the White House inform Congress of such prisoner releases from Gitmo
Bay incarceration no less than 30 days from the anticipated change in status of
any Gitmo terrorists?
There are no exceptions written in the law.
There is no wiggle room for the President to use the excuse of "time
is of the essence." Obama has clearly overstepped his authority in an
illegal act. Mark this up on the wall with all the other illegal acts
Obama has engaged in. Be prepared for many more similar instances.
If Republicans manage to capture the Senate with
a significant majority beginning in January 2015, they should consider
impeachment proceedings. By then America will have sustained even more
financial hardship from Obamacare and all the other Executive Orders and EPA
regulations that Obama has managed to essentially incorporate as if these actions
were actually law.
What the White House has done in the instant
case of releasing five Taliban terrorists could easily be construed as a standalone,
impeachable offense for President Obama. Let's remember that there are no
Constitutional or statutory conditions that have to be met for the House of
Representatives to bring charges of "high crimes and misdemeanors"
against a sitting president.
It is all dependent upon the process for the
House and the Senate to determine what constitutes an impeachable offense.
Basically, anything that a president does that challenges the oath of
office to protect and defend the American people and the states of the United
States is grounds for bringing charges of impeachment.
Again, there is no specific law or laws that
outline specific crimes that would constitute "high crimes and
misdemeanors" as stated in the Constitution. It is totally dependent
upon the entire Congress to determine whether a president has violated his oath
of office.


"Obumer" doesn't believe there is a law that he, or his administration, can't ignore. The DOJ sees it the same way.
ReplyDelete