Obama - The Taliban Five May Attack us again - Bologna

By Elizabeth Nelson

Remember when Obama, said, "It’s ‘absolutely’ possible that released prisoners may attack us again"

“In terms of potential threats, the release of the Taliban who were being held in Guantanamo was conditioned on the Qataris keeping eyes on them and creating a structure in which we can monitor their activities. We will be keeping eyes on them."

Is there the possibility of some of them trying to return to activities that are detrimental to us?  Absolutely. That’s been true of all the prisoners that were released from Guantanamo - there’s a certain recidivism rate that takes place.

I wouldn't be doing it if I thought that it was contrary to American national security, and we have confidence that we will be in a position to go after them if in fact they are engaging in activities that threaten our defenses.

But this is what happens at the end of wars.

That was true for George Washington that was true for Abraham Lincoln that was true for FDR. That’s been true of every combat situation. That at some point, you make sure that you try to get your folks back ...and that’s the right thing to do.”  

All this phony on-again-off-again American Patriotism, from a Kenyan occupying president slays me. This idiot really believes that he can just release the five most dangerous men in the world, back into the world and if they happen to fall into that "recidivism rate" and relapse into the terrorism that they wear like an old shoe, he'll what, hit the "reset button" before they attack us?

So, after one of the Taliban Five has already come out saying they are going to kidnap  more Americans and continue their Jihad against Americans, the reaction at the White House of course isn't saying, “Ooops, we made a mistake and we need to 'go after them,'" but instead, "let’s send idiot Kerry out to defend our know-nothing emperor”:


 Kerry strongly defended the decision to recover Bergdahl, amid strong evidence he deserted his post.

"What I know today is what the president of the United States knows, [which is absolutely nothing – except what the hears on [FOX News] it would have been offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind, no matter what, to leave an American behind in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head, do any number of things," he said. Read more FoxNews

Yet, we left our men do die a violent death in Benghazi and continue to leave two Americans, a Marine in Mexico, and a Pastor in Iran, to be beaten and mistreated? What, no “fake patriotism” Gitmo or Federal Prison exchanges for them? 

What if Waleed M. Shehri; Satam al Suqami; Wail M. Alshehri; Abdu Aziz;  al Omari Fayez Banihammad, Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi; Mohand al Sherhri; Majed Moqed, Salem al Hazmi and Saeed al Ghamdi (all living 9/11 Hijackers) and Osama Bin Laden (if he were still alive today) were on the list of "to be released" for Bowe Bergdahl, would you still be in favor of the release of these prisoners for a [warrior for Islam] deserter?

We all expect the Republicans to come out with justifiable outrage and this lawless Emperor's action, but when even Diane Feinstein (D-CA) comes out and said, "...I strongly believe that we should have been consulted, that the law should have been followed and I very much regret that that was not the case....

Let me help you liberals with Frankenstein's translation; what she's trying to say here, in case you don't get it, we call people who act outside the law criminals.  Obama took a vow "to protect America from enemies foreign and domestic” not to protect the enemy from America.   However, his willful poor decisions have put our country in danger. 

Make no mistake, we will see these men again, when they come back and continue what they started, thanks to this lawless man and his criminal act.