Showing posts with label Jenna Wolfe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jenna Wolfe. Show all posts

March 29, 2013

A pregnant lesbian: isn't that like a major inconsistency or something?

By Correctamundo  


This is kind of like a cat chasing its tail. You have lesbians that obviously like other women and have no desire to be intimate or otherwise with a man, then they want to marry that woman, which then leads to starting a family, which then goes back to having to have a man or his best swimmers to become pregnant, which takes us back to a lesbian liking women and not having any desire to be intimate or otherwise with a man but has to be in order to get pregnant. That's not hypocritical in the least.

And in light of the recent goings-on at SCOTUS with the same-sex marriage issue, Today show personality Jenna Wolfe and her girlfriend, NBC News correspondent Stephanie Gosk, decided to spring their news on the world during the show.

Another network news personality has come out! No, not Shepard Smith—weekend Today show anchor Jenna Wolfe announced on today’s episode of the NBC morning show that she and her girlfriend of three years, NBC News correspondent Stephanie Gosk, were expecting a baby.

“I have big news, this is big for me” Wolfe, 39, told Matt Lauer. “I’m actually pregnant — I’m quite pregnant, actually! My girlfriend Stephanie, who works here at NBC— we’re expecting a baby girl in the end of August.”


What's funny about this article are the comments by one 'Brian' who isn't very happy with Jenna and their gay cause being damaged with her little announcement.....cat fight! Meowwww.....

No. 3 · Brian

I am so sick of women who claim to be homosexuals but who then go and have sex with a man for the purpose of having a baby. These women are harming our cause. Fake lesbians suck.

No. 6 · Brian

Fake lesbians suck. Don’t want them in our community.

At the very least, Jenna Wolfe appears to have exploited a man for his sperm. Women who exploit men are just as bad as men who exploit women.

No. 10 · Brian

Women represent a danger to the gay rights cause because their sexuality can be faked, unlike a man’s. Women should therefore be kept at arm’s length. Down with pregnant lesbians.

And then there's the comments on this Washington Times article regarding the same story about Jenna Wolfe.

Adam_Saline 

They may be "expecting a girl," but they are not having a child together.

PeterSides 

All she had to say was "I am a typical liberal nut-bucket forcing an innocent child into my selfishness!"

santa claus 

This is why we have been led to believe gay is most important issue0of the day. Gays have quietly made their way to top positions and for years feed us dogma slanted to make us think we need to be pro gay or we are "bad" people. Why didn't she tell us she was gay years ago? No such thing as unbiased in the Main Scream Media. They misinform the public to suit their agenda while covering up their true identities and biases. How can you trust her news reporting now knowing she is a liar and activist? NBC should change to NGC. She like many others have deceived the public. They should all be fired for being imposters. No trust for her and the many others like her from your local school board to school board members and politicians. Shame on them. They disrespect the people the pretend to serve. They serve only themselves and their causes.

greywulf1064

Imagine that, two women had difficulty conceiving.....gee, that should tell you something!


That last comment pretty much sums it up for me and why we need to quit messing with our definitions. There's a reason men's and women's body parts are different and yet fit together perfectly. We are not simultaneous hermaphrodites, meaning we have both sex organs so a female/female can be together to procreate, etc., or even a banana slug which can fertilize itself. There's a reason and man needs and women and vice versa for procreation. 

Here's a couple questions that I've never gotten a straight answer to (no pun intended....well maybe...): 

1. If homosexuality is completely normal, why is it called an 'alternative' lifestyle, which implies that there is a 'norm' out there (i.e., heterosexuality).

2) If homosexuality is completely normal and natural and can produce the same outcomes as heterosexual couples, then how would you have come to be if your dad had married a man or your mom had married a woman to begin with?

3) If we were to ban heterosexuality right now - let's say we even exterminate all heterosexuals - will humanity continue to populate the earth as it is now thru homosexuality or will it die out in a generation or so?

Maybe the Today show or NBC News can do an investigative special on these questions and get back to me.