Before I start, let me get a couple of definitions out of the way.
Wrong [rawng, rong] - adjective
- not in accordance with what is morally right or good: a wrong deed.
- deviating from truth or fact; erroneous: a wrong answer.
- out of order; awry; amiss: Something is wrong with the machine.
bad, evil, wicked, sinful, immoral, iniquitous, reprehensible, crooked, inaccurate, incorrect, false, untrue.
False [fawls] - adjective, fals·er, fals·est
- not true or correct; erroneous: a false statement.
- tending to deceive or mislead; deceptive: a false impression.
- not genuine; counterfeit.
mistaken, incorrect, wrong, untrue, untruthful, lying, mendacious.
Okay - now that we got that cleared up, let's turn to Little Debbie spinning the Obama camp's latest narrative about Libya.
Piers Morgan, CNN: The really important horse that should be flogged is the behavior and the statements of those who are in positions of responsibility and we would assume knowledge. And it's pretty unAmerican, pretty unAmerican to be putting up completely false statements before you know the facts, isn't it?
Debbie Wasseerman Schultz, DNC chair: Piers, it is not okay for you to be saying that the administration was putting out completely false statements. They put out information that they had at the time based on the intelligence that they were given --
Piers Morgan: That turned out to be completely wrong.
Wasserman Schultz: Well that doesn't mean it was false. It doesn't mean that it was deliberate. It means that.
Morgan: What?! Now wait a minute. If you put out a false statement, then it's false, it's wrong. It's both of those things.
Wasserman Schultz: But you're suggesting that it's … Piers, what you're suggesting is that it was somehow deliberate. It was not deliberate. What they did was it was important to get information out that they had at the time. And they did that. And as they learned more information, they corrected the original information that they put out. But there was nothing sinister here. This was simply the president of the United States and the administration making sure that we did a careful investigation, gave the American people the information that they needed at the time that we had based on our best intelligence and then as more intelligence was gathered we gave the updated information. There is nothing sinister about that.
What's terrible unfortunate though, is that you do -- there's no around these investigations that Republicans in Congress and Mitt Romney have left to go after the administration questioning whether or not there was any deliberate attempt to mislead. We should be closing ranks, working together to prevent this from happening again.
Morgan: Well the answer to that Debbie, is -- the answer to that is to make sure that the original statements that were made are accurate.
Debbie Wasseerman Schultz, DNC chair: Piers, it is not okay for you to be saying that the administration was putting out completely false statements. They put out information that they had at the time based on the intelligence that they were given --
Piers Morgan: That turned out to be completely wrong.
Wasserman Schultz: Well that doesn't mean it was false. It doesn't mean that it was deliberate. It means that.
Morgan: What?! Now wait a minute. If you put out a false statement, then it's false, it's wrong. It's both of those things.
Wasserman Schultz: But you're suggesting that it's … Piers, what you're suggesting is that it was somehow deliberate. It was not deliberate. What they did was it was important to get information out that they had at the time. And they did that. And as they learned more information, they corrected the original information that they put out. But there was nothing sinister here. This was simply the president of the United States and the administration making sure that we did a careful investigation, gave the American people the information that they needed at the time that we had based on our best intelligence and then as more intelligence was gathered we gave the updated information. There is nothing sinister about that.
What's terrible unfortunate though, is that you do -- there's no around these investigations that Republicans in Congress and Mitt Romney have left to go after the administration questioning whether or not there was any deliberate attempt to mislead. We should be closing ranks, working together to prevent this from happening again.
Morgan: Well the answer to that Debbie, is -- the answer to that is to make sure that the original statements that were made are accurate.
Piers is absolutely correct in his last statement. Original statements should have been accurate. And now we have a bunch of misinformation and back-pedaling. First, it was a little known video clip that no one had ever heard of and that had been out for months. Then, it was a 'spontaneous' uprising, complete with 'spontaneous' war weapons. But then, maybe it was a terrorist attack or pre-planned. No, wait - we completely disavow everything ever said about it and Ambassador Susan Rice was wrong, wrong, wrong.
And ironically - what does Susan tweet on 9/11/12?
The problem we have here is a national travesty and dead American's whose families want answers.
Pat Smith is one such mother. Her son, Sean Smith, was killed on that fateful day. He was the avid gamer that went by the name Vile Rat. He shared this ominous message on a gaming chat room just hours before:
Gianturco shared a chat room message posted by Vile Rat [a.k.a. Smith], presumably from earlier that day.“(12:54:09 PM) vile_rat: assuming we don’t die tonight. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.”
It is just shameless for Little Debbie to go running around, playing Obama's minion, trying to use semantics to dodge the real issue. It depends on what the definition of 'is' is. What it 'is' is a load of crap being piled on the American citizens and on the families of the victims.
And Hillary Rod-Up-Her-Butt Clinton is the one ultimately responsible. Perhaps if she wasn't busy partying like a fool and visiting with her Red Chinese friends, she would have been on top of this like Bubba was with Monica.
From the State Department website:
The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad. This mission is executed through the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS). Personal and facility protection are the most critical elements of the DS mission abroad as they directly impact upon the Department’s ability to carry out its foreign policy. With terrorist organizations and coalitions operating across international borders, the threat of terrorism against U.S. interests remains great. Therefore, any U.S. mission overseas can be a target even if identified as being in a low-threat environment.
Nobody in this party knows what they are doing. Little Debbie has spun so many lies and deceptions, she's permanently brain damaged. And it all flows downward, from the DNC and their party platform and beliefs to the President and to his cabinet. This is their MO - dodge and duck. Provide no answers. Shift the blame to someone else. And don't forget - Little Debbie is up for reelection this year.
Ladies and gentlemen - if we don't stop this corruption and incompetence on 6 November, our country is lost. Another 4 years of this administration and his minions will fundamentally bring about the 'change' that he and this liberal party wants. We the People cannot allow this to happen.
For further reading, please see my previous post: Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z
From the State Department website:
The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad. This mission is executed through the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS). Personal and facility protection are the most critical elements of the DS mission abroad as they directly impact upon the Department’s ability to carry out its foreign policy. With terrorist organizations and coalitions operating across international borders, the threat of terrorism against U.S. interests remains great. Therefore, any U.S. mission overseas can be a target even if identified as being in a low-threat environment.
Following the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Nairobi (Kenya) in 1998, security countermeasures for our U.S. missions overseas took on greater importance, and this continues today.
Nobody in this party knows what they are doing. Little Debbie has spun so many lies and deceptions, she's permanently brain damaged. And it all flows downward, from the DNC and their party platform and beliefs to the President and to his cabinet. This is their MO - dodge and duck. Provide no answers. Shift the blame to someone else. And don't forget - Little Debbie is up for reelection this year.
Ladies and gentlemen - if we don't stop this corruption and incompetence on 6 November, our country is lost. Another 4 years of this administration and his minions will fundamentally bring about the 'change' that he and this liberal party wants. We the People cannot allow this to happen.
For further reading, please see my previous post: Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z
Who would have thought that Piers Morgan would actually grill Dear Debbie like BBG ribs. He roasted her in her own hypocrisy. And Dear Debbie is the voice of the Democrat Party as DNC Chairwoman. That has to illustrate just how far the Democrat Party has drifted to the left.
ReplyDeleteThis was just another one of those WTF? moments when Debbie entered the liberal progressive twilight zone of another universe.
ReplyDelete