Debbie Wasserman Schultz Predicts Party Will Exceed Expectations in 2014

HERE is the story that goes with the post title.

I'm still bewildered as to why Deb blocked me on Twitter.

They Shoot Horses Don't They? - Debbie Wasserman Schultz Sustains Hamstring Injury at Congressional Women's Softball Game

Sorry to hear the nag stumbled coming out of the gate.

She's never been a good bet on dirt or turf.

She's more at home in the mud.

She's a real Mudder.

Oh well, tear up your paramutual slips and cry in your beer.

I'd never bet on her.

But, I'm nothing but a racetrack lout...I mean tout.

Deb blocked me on Twitter months ago.

I still don't understand why.

Maybe it was something we published here at the old blogstead on Sep 25, 2012:  Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z

Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Not Yet Enrolling in Obamacare: ‘I’m a Little Busy, So’

I'm proud to report that pathological liar DWS has blocked me on Twitter.

Please retweet this post so Deb knows I'm still thinking about her.

I wish this movie was based on a true story

Despicable Dipstick Debbie Wasserman Schultz does it again. Another deceitful political play on the tragedy of the Boston bombing

Related Capitalist Preservation Post: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z
                                                .....................................................
By Rob Janicki

Joe Battenfeld, columnist for the Boston Herald, is not too enamored with Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chairwoman of the DNC.

You knew it would happen eventually, but so soon?

It took only one week for a partisan group — in this case the Democratic Party — to turn the terror bombings in Boston into a crass political ploy.

Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz was behind this tasteless tactic, sending out an email and tweet asking people to sign a supposed “thank you note” to the first responders. That would be nice except for the fact that in order to “sign” the note, you have to give the Democratic party your email account and ZIP code...

Obviously Debbie isn't going to let a human tragedy go to waste and like Battenfeld noted, it just came a lot sooner than anyone would have expected.

This is a classic “data mining” technique that candidates and political organizations use to target 

voters to raise money. The thank you note even includes a disclaimer saying the DNC can use the information they get for any political purposes or even advertising...

Just another base and politically craven act from the Queen of Mean politics.   No surprise here.  What does surprise somewhat, is that Dear Debbie had the unmitigated gall to launch into an attack on Republicans for exposing her despicable use of a tragedy to raise money for the DNC. 

Pretty clear, right? Not 
apparently to Democrats, who not only refused to apologize, but actually defended the blatant fundraising pitch while blaming Republicans for “politicizing” the issue by criticizing Democrats...

Typical Debbie.  Blame opponents for politicizing your blatant money grubbing politicizing of a human tragedy.  Makes perfect sense to me for a low life like Debbie.  And let's not forget that Debbie is the face of the Democrat Party as Chairwoman of the DNC.  This tells me everything I need to know about Democrats.

Read Joe Battenfeld's entire column here and see how he really feels about despicable Debbie. 

The Disgusting and Unconscionable Debbie Wasserman Schultz Sez GOP Filibuster is 'Disgusting and Unconscionable'

Related Post: Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z

Great news - you, too, can intern for Little Debbie Whuts-her-face Schultz

By Correctamundo

For all you 'Jew Bags' out there, now's your chance to intern for Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz.  All you have to be is a lib and a student - pretty easy to find in any given school in our society today, what with all the crap they pass off as 'educational'.

Thank you for expressing an interest in interning in the office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. As an intern, you would be a welcomed member of our team, which is dedicated to offering the best service possible to the people of Florida's 20th Congressional District.

Students chosen will perform a variety of duties for our office and will play an active role in the daily tasks that face a Member of Congress. Interns will have the opportunity to learn and assist all members of my office, assisting with legislative, press, and administrative duties.

An internship in our District Office and on Capitol Hill is what one makes of it. Dedicated interns have the opportunity - provided they are motivated, energetic, and creative - to learn how legislation becomes law and affects peoples' lives.

We are always looking for hard working students who are interested in entering public service or learning how Congress works.

To apply, please send a resume, a cover letter with days of availability, including your preferred start and end dates, and a one-page writing sample, to one of the following:

For the Pembroke Pines/Aventura Office:
FL23DOInternResumes@mail.house.gov

For the Washington, DC Office:
RepDWSresumes@gmail.com


The application deadlines for the DC office:

Spring Semester Internship – November 28

Summer Internship – Feb. 22

Fall Semester Internship – July 15


The application deadlines for the Pembroke Pines/Aventura offices are:

Spring Semester Internship – November 20

Summer Internship – April 1

Fall Semester Internship – August 1

Yes, Little Debbie is dedicated to offering you her best, including the best meals around. She's working hard for you so that you can eat cavier and drink champagne on the taxpayer's dime. This is a sequester crisis!

(See also:  Debbie Wasserman Schultz Worries Her Staff Is Being 'Priced Out' Of Good Meals Because of Sequester)

But you better hurry - the deadline for the summer internship is just around the corner on Little Debbie's birthday - April Fool's Day.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Worries Her Staff Is Being 'Priced Out' Of Good Meals Because of Sequester

Related reading: Our very own Correctamundo wrote the definitive DWS post.  

Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z

Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.): on Hillary 2016: ‘I Don’t Know a Woman or a Man’ Who Doesn’t Want To See Her Run

Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz predicts doomsday if sequester kicks in - only the wealthy will survive, gun fanatics will run amok

By Correctamundo  

I was hoping we had heard the last of Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz for awhile - she's been laying pretty low since the election. Now that it's over, she's got no one's record to lie about.

Well, she's baaaaacccckk.  And she's single-handedly predicted the end of the world via the sequestration - the Mayans aren't happy about stealing their thunder on that one. And of course, only the rich will survive as usual. The gun debate will be delayed, meaning law-abiding citizens exercising their 2nd Amendment rights will be running amok, keeping their guns locked up in their gun safes and only using them for protection.

Before watching this, may I remind everyone that it was Obama who proposed, wrote and signed the sequester.

CHRIS JANSING: And I guess the other question is, if the sequester, you know, battle continues to go on, what it means for other things that need to get done. For example, today the president’s grass roots group is planning a national day of action with a protest outside of NRA offices, and I guess about a hundred other smaller events and rallies. I mean, for example, would work on gun legislation be delayed because of the sequester?

DEBBIE WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ: Well, everything is — everything would be delayed. You’re going to have massive indiscriminate cuts to education, to health care research, you’re going to have research grants that won’t get funded. I mean, the decisions that we make now, letting the sequester kick in, have short-term effects that affect people’s daily lives, but they also have significant long-term effects. If a university isn’t able to hire a researcher or — because the grant doesn’t come through — that researcher never does groundbreaking work that could save thousands of lives later on down the road. I mean, this is dramatically irresponsible. It’s irresponsible for our economy and the impact on it. It’s irresponsible to, in terms of the impact it would leave on the middle class and working families. The only ones who get protected are the wealthiest, most fortunate Americans. But that appears to be the Republicans’ goal. And it’s just baffling. How could they possibly continue to only care about people who are already doing really well who are the only ones that would be shielded from the impact of sequester cuts?

Have you ever heard such tripe before in your life? Research grants that won't get funded and/or that can save thousands of lives - you mean like a museum of magic that received $147,000 to study the audiences of magic shows or more than $550,000 of U.S. taxes that went to the production of a documentary on how rock bands contributed to the fall of the Soviet empire? And why exactly would only the wealthiest survive? 

Of course, she didn't get into the gun legislation part of it but she did lump it in with 'everything would be delayed' - that's code for 'The sky is falling at the hands of the GOP even though we had control of the Senate for much of Barry's first term yet did nothing but pass the healthcare tax....er, healthcare act'. So the ceremonial banging of the made-up crises drum continues. As they say in Looney Tunes land:

Question To Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Has The DNC Let Obama Down?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz: South Florida's shame and most repugnant Congresswoman

By Rob Janicki

I admit that I missed last week's ongoing adventure in the life of Florida's most repugnant United States Congresswoman, Debbie "I'll lie about anything to get re-elected"  Wasserman Schultz.

The Shark Tank
A group of sign-waving campaign ralliers comprised of both Democrat and Republican supporters outside an Aventura, Florida polling location witnessed Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz get involved in a heated altercation with an Aventura policeman after she apparently took issue with his request to not engage in campaign activities in the street which would hold up oncoming traffic...

Apparently disorderly conduct is not in Dear Debbie's vocabulary when it potentially pertains to her.

...She listened to the police officer’s respectful and reasonable request, but Wasserman Schultz continued to argue with the police officer, according to several people who witnessed the incident.

Wasserman Schultz was greeting voters and waiving her campaign signs on a street leading into the polling site and was obstructing traffic by stopping cars before they could even enter the parking area...

Only a brain dead liberal Democrat would do something like that.  I'm surprised the officer didn't tickle her fancy with a taser.  I might have been tempted to and maybe the officer was tempted, but showed greater restraint than I might have.

Not wanting to waste all the invective she had remaining, Wasserman Schultz let go the later arriving mayor.

...Five minutes later, the Aventura City Mayor came to the scene and was confronted by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and proceeded to get an earful from her as well.

Wasserman Schultz stayed about 20 minutes before she  left the scene with the six or so supporters she brought with her.  After the congresswoman left, one of the Democrat supporters who witnessed the whole incident confronted the Mayor and told him that what she did was “extremely inappropriate” for her to berate him in the manner she did...

Being the gentleman that I am, I could never call Wasserman Schultz a bitch, as I believe her to be, since this just doesn't seem to adequately describe this shedevil.

More on Dear Debbie from a previous dust up with a fellow Democrat.

This altercation is just a few days removed from an earlier incident in which the congresswoman took issue with a Democrat voter who refused to campaign and support her and instead supported her Republican congressional opponent Karen Harrington...

Yer flat assed outright lie o' the mornin': Debbie Wasserman Schultz

By Rob Janicki

Seldom a week goes by that Debbie Wasserman Schultz isn't caught lying egregiously.  Not fibbing or misspeaking, just flat out lying.  DWS is a pathological liar.  In other words, DWS suffers from a psychological disorder that prevents her from expressing the truth, as the rest of the world knows it,  when it may conflict with her internalized view of Wasserman Schultz reality.  This is a common psychological defense mechanism to preserve one's grip on their pseudo reality. It's the only reality they know and it must be preserved at all costs.

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz seems to reside in a different reality than the rest of us. After the debate last night she said:

What I was surprised about Greta, during the entire section of the debate on the Middle East, Mitt Romney didn’t bring up Israel once and I think it just shows he isn’t committed to Israel as he says he is and has really only used the issue as a political opportunity.

The only problem for Wasserman Schultz is that a mere glance at the transcript of last night’s debate shows that Romney mentioned Israel eleven times. Here are three examples of Mitt Romney expressing his support for Israel:

We also have to stand by our allies, I think the tension that has existed between Israel and the United States is very unfortunate.
When I am president of the United States, we will stand by Israel. And if Israel is attacked, we have their back.
The turmoil with Israel, I mean the president received a letter from 38 Democratic senators saying the tension with Israel was a real problem.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s attempt to spin the president’s abysmal record on Israel is unbecoming, and let us hope that Florida’s Jewish community will take note of Mitt Romney’s actual statements in the debate in their state...

How on earth the voters in Florida's 23rd Congressional District cannot see through Wasserman Schultz is beyond me.  The answer has to be that the majority of the voters in the district just aren't paying attention.

Capitalist Preservation unabashedly support Karen Harrington's campaign to unseat Wasserman Schultz and urge you to visit Karen's website HERE to support her too.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz' stunning ignorance of Obama's 'Kill List'

Glenn Greenwald

...That Obama has a "kill list" has been known since January, 2010, and has been widely reported and discussed in every major American newspaper since April 2010. A major controversy over chronic White House leaks often featured complaints about this article (New York Times, 5 June 2012: "Senators to Open Inquiry Into 'Kill List' and Iran Security Leaks"). The Attorney General, Eric Holder, gave a major speech defending it.

But Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic Congresswoman from Florida and the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, does not know about any of this. She has never heard of any of it. She has managed to remain completely ignorant about the fact that President Obama has asserted and exercised the power to secretly place human beings, including US citizens, on his "kill list" and then order the CIA to extinguish their lives.

Just marvel at this stunning, completely inexcusable two-minute display of wholesale ignorance by this elected official and DNC chair. Here she is after the second presidential debate being asked by Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change about the "kill list" and whether Romney should be trusted with this power. She doesn't defend the "kill list". She doesn't criticize it. She makes clear that she has never heard of it and then contemptuously treats Rudkowski like he is some sort of frivolous joke for thinking that it is real:...  READ MORE

Debbie Wasserman Schultz lied when she said Dem Convention would not accept donations from corporations or special interest groups

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The Democratic National Convention relied on at least $5 million in corporate donations, despite repeated pledges by top party officials only to use money raised from individuals.

Reports filed Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission show the convention's host committee, Charlotte in 2012, raised $24 million, well short of its $36.7 million fundraising goal.

To help make up for the shortfall, committee officials spent $5 million raised directly from corporations to rent the cavernous basketball arena used as the convention hall. They spent nearly $8 million more from a line of credit provided by Charlotte-based Duke Energy, the nation's largest electricity provider.

Top Democrats, including Democratic Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had pledged prior to the 2012 convention not to raise money from special interests and to cap individual donations at $100,000.

"This convention will be different," Wasserman Schultz said last year at the convention kickoff event in Charlotte. "We will make this the first convention in history that does not accept any funds from lobbyists, corporations or political action committees. This will be the first modern political convention funded by the grassroots, funded by the people."

In addition to spending cash from corporate sponsors on direct convention expenses, records show much off the $24 million billed as being raised from individual donors came from special interest groups that employ lobbyists, corporate-funded foundations and the very wealthy...

Debbie Wasserman Schulltz: Exploiting Breast Cancer

The Shark Tank

Congressman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s re-election campaign now appears to be in desperation mode, as her campaign has disseminated a campaign mailer reminding prospective voters that she’s been a a breast cancer survivor on three separate occasions. 

Not that this fact is in any way a pre-requisite for public office, Wasserman Schultz’s Republican opponent Karen Harrington is also a three time cancer survivor.  As Harrington has referenced her past bouts with cancer on her website, it’s really a tasteless move to use a paid campaign advertisement that plays on the sympathy of voters in such a manner.  Debbie’s mailer not only shamelessly exploits her own past health issues, it also takes a needless cheap shot at the same insurance companies and their employees who no doubt facilitated Debbie’s own treatment and recovery...

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz: Wrong Statements About Libya Doesn't Mean They Were False

By Correctamundo 

Before I start, let me get a couple of definitions out of the way.


Wrong [rawng, rong] - adjective

• not in accordance with what is morally right or good: a wrong deed.
• deviating from truth or fact; erroneous: a wrong answer.
• out of order; awry; amiss: Something is wrong with the machine.

Synonyms 

bad, evil, wicked, sinful, immoral, iniquitous, reprehensible, crooked, inaccurate, incorrect, false, untrue.

False [fawls] - adjective, fals·er, fals·est

• not true or correct; erroneous: a false statement.
• tending to deceive or mislead; deceptive: a false impression.
• not genuine; counterfeit.

Synonyms 

mistaken, incorrect, wrong, untrue, untruthful, lying, mendacious.

Okay - now that we got that cleared up, let's turn to Little Debbie spinning the Obama camp's latest narrative about Libya.

Piers Morgan, CNN: The really important horse that should be flogged is the behavior and the statements of those who are in positions of responsibility and we would assume knowledge. And it's pretty unAmerican, pretty unAmerican to be putting up completely false statements before you know the facts, isn't it?

Debbie Wasseerman Schultz, DNC chair: Piers, it is not okay for you to be saying that the administration was putting out completely false statements. They put out information that they had at the time based on the intelligence that they were given --

Piers Morgan: That turned out to be completely wrong.

Wasserman Schultz: Well that doesn't mean it was false. It doesn't mean that it was deliberate. It means that.

Morgan: What?! Now wait a minute. If you put out a false statement, then it's false, it's wrong. It's both of those things.

Wasserman Schultz: But you're suggesting that it's … Piers, what you're suggesting is that it was somehow deliberate. It was not deliberate. What they did was it was important to get information out that they had at the time. And they did that. And as they learned more information, they corrected the original information that they put out. But there was nothing sinister here. This was simply the president of the United States and the administration making sure that we did a careful investigation, gave the American people the information that they needed at the time that we had based on our best intelligence and then as more intelligence was gathered we gave the updated information. There is nothing sinister about that. 

What's terrible unfortunate though, is that you do -- there's no around these investigations that Republicans in Congress and Mitt Romney have left to go after the administration questioning whether or not there was any deliberate attempt to mislead. We should be closing ranks, working together to prevent this from happening again.

Morgan: Well the answer to that Debbie, is -- the answer to that is to make sure that the original statements that were made are accurate.

Piers is absolutely correct in his last statement. Original statements should have been accurate.  And now we have a bunch of misinformation and back-pedaling. First, it was a little known video clip that no one had ever heard of and that had been out for months. Then, it was a 'spontaneous' uprising, complete with 'spontaneous' war weapons. But then, maybe it was a terrorist attack or pre-planned. No, wait - we completely disavow everything ever said about it and Ambassador Susan Rice was wrong, wrong, wrong.

And ironically - what does Susan tweet on 9/11/12?

Susan Rice

• ✔

@AmbassadorRice

Today we pledge to never condone terrorism; never make excuses for it; never keep company with those who sow hatred; and never forget.

11 Sep 12

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

The problem we have here is a national travesty and dead American's whose families want answers.

Pat Smith is one such mother. Her son, Sean Smith, was killed on that fateful day.  He was the avid gamer that went by the name Vile Rat.  He shared this ominous message on a gaming chat room just hours before:

Gianturco shared a chat room message posted by Vile Rat [a.k.a. Smith], presumably from earlier that day.

“(12:54:09 PM) vile_rat: assuming we don’t die tonight. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.”

It is just shameless for Little Debbie to go running around, playing Obama's minion, trying to use semantics to dodge the real issue.  It depends on what the definition of 'is' is.  What it 'is' is a load of crap being piled on the American citizens and on the families of the victims.

And Hillary Rod-Up-Her-Butt Clinton is the one ultimately responsible. Perhaps if she wasn't busy partying like a fool and visiting with her Red Chinese friends, she would have been on top of this like Bubba was with Monica.

From the State Department website:

The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad. This mission is executed through the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS). Personal and facility protection are the most critical elements of the DS mission abroad as they directly impact upon the Department’s ability to carry out its foreign policy. With terrorist organizations and coalitions operating across international borders, the threat of terrorism against U.S. interests remains great. Therefore, any U.S. mission overseas can be a target even if identified as being in a low-threat environment.

Following the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Nairobi (Kenya) in 1998, security countermeasures for our U.S. missions overseas took on greater importance, and this continues today. 

Nobody in this party knows what they are doing.  Little Debbie has spun so many lies and deceptions, she's permanently brain damaged.  And it all flows downward, from the DNC and their party platform and beliefs to the President and to his cabinet.  This is their MO - dodge and duck.  Provide no answers. Shift the blame to someone else.  And don't forget - Little Debbie is up for reelection this year.

Ladies and gentlemen - if we don't stop this corruption and incompetence on 6 November, our country is lost.  Another 4 years of this administration and his minions will fundamentally bring about the 'change' that he and this liberal party wants.  We the People cannot allow this to happen.  

For further reading, please see my previous post:  Capitalist Preservation Special Report: Political Hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) Exposed From A to Z