May 31, 2013

Sure Obama Won Fair and Square; Melowese Richardson is going to Prison to prove it!

By Capitalist Preservation Contributor Elizabeth Nelson


“Obama makes history with Hamilton County Win” 51% over Romney’s 46%, but wait, not so fast!
                                 ---------------------------
Melowese Richardson is the former Ohio poll worker who blatantly and publically admitted to Cincinnati’s (Hamilton County) WCPO-TV in February that she flat-out to voted twice, first by submitting an absentee ballot, and then later voting for the current President Barack Obama at the polls, in November.
 

“Yes I voted twice,” Richardson told WCPO. “I, after registering thousands and thousands of people, certainly wanted my vote to count, so I voted. I voted at the polls.”  The Blaze 

Well, this week her past caught up to her, and she was found guilty of illegally voting!


Ms. Richardson was accused of eight counts of illegal voting in the 2008, 2011 and 2012 elections. She pleaded no contest to four counts in exchange for prosecutors dropping the remaining charges. 

A judge immediately convicted Richardson, who now faces up to six years in prison.


12 comments:

  1. the graphic at the top is a complete fabrication...why lie about something that's so easily discredited? the claim itself is ridiculous, the fact that it's so trivially debunked is just sad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BREAKING: St. Lucie County, Florida Had 141.1% Turnout; Obama Won County http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html keep believing he "won" legally, if it makes you feel better, and "no one" but this misguided voter and her family voted more than once, and I have swamp land with Bridge and an ocean view in FL to send you!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Discredit the facts put forward in our post. Debunk them. You didn't and can't because these facts weren't 'fabricated' out of thin air. Unlike Obama, facts are made of whole clothe. Elizabeth beat me to providing a link, of which there are many, backing the claim she made in her post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yeah...i didn't say anything about whether he won legally. i said the graphic at the top that says 100% of Cuyahoga County voted and they all voted for Obama is an absolute lie. Since you were unable to check the state website without me providing a direct link...http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_boe/en-US/ElectionResults2012/Nov2012/amended/11062012FinalAmendedofficialResultsbyContest.HTM

    and ENelson talking about St. Lucie County, here's snopes debunking that one too. Granted you have to scroll down to find that specific one because so many BS claims have been made:http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp



    To save you the trouble of scrolling to find it on snopes, they had a 2-page ballot. 141% is the based on the number of cards (remember, 2 cards per ballot). The only way it would be impossible is if they had over 200%. Again...2 cards, so the card count is 2 per legal voter.


    I'm not supporting anyone, but check your facts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. numerous comments on the St. Lucie County article you linked already explain why it was 141%. and i never said voter fraud doesn't happen. i said your cuyahoga county graphic was a complete lie.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ok, you're using "Snopes" (a liberal, biased, pro-Obama, husband and wife team, that has been proven wrong more times than right) as your "fact-based" information? http://www.metroedit.com/2009/05/how-accurate-is-snopescom/ I'm almost surprised you didn't use Wikipedia as a source.
    FL and OH (proven by Richardson's prison sentence) aren't the only places that had voter fraud, I direct you to Philadelphia and the Philadelphia House Speaker who questions the race; you see, I do check facts, and I don't use Snopes or Fox News to do it.
    http://patdollard.com/2012/11/philadelphia-house-speaker-raises-specter-of-massive-obama-voter-fraud/
    But we could go on and on about this, look me up on Twitter, to continue!

    ReplyDelete
  7. i like that you complain about me using snopes because it's biased...and then you direct me to a republican speaker who "questions the race" and has absolutely no facts to back up his suspicions. the middle of the article you linked even says:

    House Speaker Sam Smith, musing over “staggering” turnout in some city precincts and reacting to wrong information that “90 percent of the precincts in Philadelphia County turned out over 90 percent of voters,” called the ability to get such numbers “questionable.”


    Note that it clearly says "reacting to wrong information"

    snopes/wikipedia/whatever else on the internet...they're fine for launching points to find reliable information. if the information didn't cite actual sources i wouldn't have used it. if you'd read the snopes thing you'd see the links they had to the actual data from St. Lucie. i linked snopes because it explained the otherwise dense data and i figured it was more likely to get the point across (i was wrong)

    the places where obama won 99% of the vote are inner-city wards with a high population of minorities and poor people...the ones mitt romney blew off repeatedly throughout his campaign. it really shouldn't be a surprise that he didn't fare so well in those polling places.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're right though, we could go on and on about this...and really, we've gotten pretty far down the road from my original point, which was only that your Cuyahoga County graphic at the top is a complete lie.

    ReplyDelete
  9. that you ACTUALLY believe that Obama could "win" 99% of any County tells me that you also believe in Unicorns, Fairies, Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy! I'm sure you are among the 49% that believe he's currently doing a "great job" with our "Once Great" Country, he's blameless in all of these current scandals, and Obamacare is a fabulous idea! Keep believing it, Fred, another thought is coming!
    Respectfully, I'm done with you!

    ReplyDelete
  10. yeah, he didn't win 99% of any county. i also never said that he did win 99% of a county...he won 99% of like the sub-polling districts within counties. that's something that frequently happens on both sides of the aisle


    you can be done whenever you want. i don't know why i even try. you're completely ignoring the original point anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think the word you're looking for is precinct. He had 99% of the vote in several inner-city precincts across the nation, but there can be hundreds of precincts per county.


    Elizabeth, your link that you posted to prove that sites like wikipedia and snopes are biased and wrong is absolutely amazing! It was pure anecdote with no citations whatsoever, not even a link to the case they were discrediting. The only link they provided to anything was a link to a wikipedia article at the bottom. Brava, really!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Its interesting all the publicity about "she will be sentenced however I can't find out what the terms were of her sentencing. My suspicions tell me that is because she got off with a reprimand.

    ReplyDelete