So, you were all for “Gay marriage” and now that “Marriage” has no definition, “one man, one woman,” how will you stand, now that Pollyanna and her sister want to marry Frank down the street? We “Narrow-minded” Christians weren’t the only ones trying to warn you, not to open this can of worms. Logic dictated that once the definition of marriage was changed, why would they stop at the Number of spouses?
Well, the homosexual society had their say, now the polyamorists want the floor!
The movement to legalize multi-partner marriage got a huge boost with this week’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that the federal government must give benefits to same-sex married partners, according to advocates of polygamy.
“We polyamorists are grateful to our brothers and sisters for blazing the marriage equality trail,” Anita Wagner Illig told U.S. News and World Report.
“I would absolutely want to seek multi-partner marriage — it would eliminate a common challenge polyamorists face when two are legally married and others in their group relationships aren’t part of that marriage,” she said.
Illig, head of the group Practical Polyamory, argued it’s a matter of equality – the concept cited by the U.S. court in its decision.
“A favorable outcome for marriage equality is a favorable outcome for multi-partner marriage, because the opposition cannot argue lack of precedent for legalizing marriage for other forms of non-traditional relationships,” she said. WND
What’s next, the sexual offenders, men and women, that prefer sex with our children? Before you get huffy, it’s already legal for them to marry, with parental consent, in some states, at 17 years old.
No comments:
Post a Comment