By Elizabeth Nelson
Gays around the world were ecstatic at the thought that
Pope Francis was going to be the “progressive Catholic pope” they were waiting for, the one to bring an end to
the "ridged, narrow minded” Catholic mentality, especially after he was caught
saying, “the Catholic
Church should not dismiss out of hand civil unions, but should study them.”
However,
what they heard was, “same-sex ‘marriage’ should not be dismissed,” and that’s
not what he said. We all know, liberals will always hear what they want to
hear, so I’m curious to know what they now think about Pope Francis after coming out
with, “the image of
God is the married couple: the
man and the woman.”
During his General Audience speech at St. Peter’s Square on Apr. 2, before a crowd estimated at 45,000, Pope Francis first cited Genesis, saying, “God created man in his own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female he created them. … Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh.”
He continued,
“Indeed, God is communion too: the three Persons of the Father, the Son and the
Holy Spirit live eternally in perfect unity. And this is precisely the mystery
of matrimony: God makes of the two spouses one single life. The Bible uses a
powerful expression and says ‘one flesh,’ so intimate is the union between man
and woman in marriage. And this is precisely the mystery of marriage: the love
of God which is reflected in the couple that decides to live together.”
“Therefore a man
leaves his home, the home of his parents, and goes to live with his wife and
unites himself so strongly to her that the two become — the Bible says — one
flesh,” said the Pope. Read more
at CNSNews:
So
basically, Pope Francis is no progressive, he’s just the same as any other
sitting Pope that has come before him, he’s just more people friendly. Did people
really think he was going to go against his faith and the Bible? We see how
that worked out for Judas.
Glad you put in the Comment Box.
ReplyDeleteI passed this on to my friends. I laughed and laughed. This is so funny. Then had a thought - do you think this came as the result of the troll's visit to the Pope last month? Just sort of, to clear up a tiny misunderstanding? :)
ROFLMAO glad you liked it; you know, I wondered that myself. Maybe could have been sent as a "hello, you aren't fooling anyone; everyone knows you're gay, come out of your grand, walk in closet." lol
ReplyDeleteEven if orientation doesn’t change, it’s best for gays/lesbians to be celibate just as it’s best for a person with tobacco orientation not to smoke. Behavior including sexual behavior can be learned. If a boy is homosexually raped repeatedly, it’s more likely he will do gay conduct in adulthood because sex abuse damaged his mind and caused him to behave in ways he wouldn’t. If the boy had not been molested, then it’s less likely he would do gay conduct in adulthood. While they have not conclusively proven same sex behaviors are genes-if that is true, it would be same as alcoholic gene.
ReplyDeleteWith ‘homophobic’, homophobia is telling truths which offend homosexual groups. With what mental health experts say on homosexuality, Mainstream psychology/medicine is not to be trusted on gay/lesbian topic and too many people accept what is said w/o challenging or having doubts. You can pay experts to say things which agree with gay/lesbian agenda and that is has happened with psychology/medicine since 1973-experts can say things to support gay agenda or any agenda. Truth with homosexuality is any ideas, speculations and truths which offend homosexual groups is condemned as homophobia as there’s alot of ideology on this. With repair therapy for homosexuals/lesbians. Repair therapy for gays and lesbians who want to be straight must be available just as repair therapy must be available for a drug junky who wants to become clean. Yes, proof burden is on repair therapists, but if you aren’t going to have repair therapy for homsexuality/lesbianism, then you may as well not have repair therapy for drug junkyism or drunkardism, because it often fails.
Finally, sex change maimings which is mutilating some1 to make them fake members of opposite sex is comparable to trying to make a man a fake animal because he thinks he is an animal trapped in a human body. Most feminists are not speaking against this. 1 would hope that feminists would oppose the mutilation that happened to Chastity Sun Bono as feminists have spoken against Female Genital Mutilation which happens in some nations. Transexuals are mutilations which no Dr. should take part in, yet most feminists are not condemning this female genital and breast mutilation as what happened to Chastity S. Bono where her healthy breasts were mutilated, dangerous hormone shots and her genitals mutilated.