Another Side to Bob Bergdahl - Crazy Stalker & Peeping Tom

Via the Daily Mail

The father of embattled POW Bowe Bergdahl, who landed on US soil today, waged a sinister campaign of stalking and harassment against pretty twin sisters – even stealing a gnome from their garden and peaking at them in the shower, the sisters claim in shocking police reports.

Bearded Robert 'Bob' Bergdahl drove by the home of Lacey and Allie Hillman ‘several times a day’ over a period of months and left 'creepy' notes for them, the sisters allege in police documents, obtained exclusively by MailOnline. Once Bergdahl banged on Allie’s door and accused her of 'two-timing' him – despite the fact that the pair never dated or were even friends, Allie told police.

The sisters decided to forget the strange incident. But then they say Bergdahl’s behavior took a sinister turn. Bergdahl, who then worked as a UPS delivery man 'was always near or on' the sisters’ property despite never having any packages to pick up or deliver, according to the report.

Allie contacted police in early October and officers promised to step up patrols in her area.

But soon after speaking to the police Allie related that a note written on UPS-headed note paper appeared on her front door which read, ‘I am sorry for whatever I did.’ The pretty blond threw the note away and told police she found it ‘creepy’. 

Just a week after leaving the note, Bergdahl drove his UPS truck to the sisters’ home, waited until Allie’s boyfriend left then confronted the bewildered brunette and accused her of cheating on him, Allie reveals. ‘Allie had opened the door when Robert knocked and he said (while laughing), “What are you two-timing me b*tch?” the Hailey Police Department report said.

The final straw came on October 26, when the sisters claim that Bergdahl lurked in the shadows outside their home for two hours before sneaking up on Lacey as soon as she stepped outside of the shower. Allie left the house at 4pm and saw Bergdahl driving by the house and ‘staring at it’, the report states. 

Then at 6pm her sister Lacey heard her dogs barking as she took a shower and immediately got out. Wearing only a towel, she walked to the front door shouting, ‘Hello,’ and suddenly saw a 'shadowed person' behind the beveled glass door, she told police. The shadowy figure suddenly pressed his hands and face against the glass and Lacey recognized him as Bergdahl. 

The report said: 'Lacey realizes it’s Robert in his UPS uniform.  'Robert motions for Lacey to come closer to the front door and wants to speak with her.  'Lacey yells for Robert to leave and also motions for him to do so as she is only in a towel and wet from the shower. ‘According to Lacey, a minute passed while Robert shook his head on the other side of the closed door and he eventually left while throwing his hands up in the air.’

Bergdahl was quizzed by officers soon after the report was lodged and warned to stay away from the sisters. He was never arrested. Police documents reveal that Bergdahl admitted ‘playing a trick’ on the sisters and stealing their gnome but denied wanting to know them on an ‘intimate basis’ claiming he was only ‘messing and joking’ around with them. Bergdahl was instructed by police not to visit the sisters’ home or Lacey’s workplace or he would be arrested and face possible trespassing or stalking charges.

Sec. of Defense, Chuck Hagel, Falls on his Sword for Obama's Failure in the Sgt. Bergdahl Prisoner Swap

By Rob Janicki

We knew Hagel was incompetent as a United States Senator and during his Senate confirmation hearing for Secretary of Defense, Hagel amply demonstrated his ineptitude and incompetence to even lead a Cub Scout Pack.

As the news of the prisoner swap came to light over the weekend, the Obama administration took a victory lap through the end zone, spiking the ball in self congratulations over releasing the top five most dangerous Taliban terrorists in Gitmo for one American Army deserter.

On Monday, Chuck Hagel was questioned in congressional hearings about who made the decision to trade the five Taliban prisoners for Sgt. Bergdahl.  Hagel acknowledged that the decision was ultimately President Obama's, as any such significant decision should be made by the president.

Nov we are seeing Hagel flip flop on that assertion as the whole prisoner swap has raised public ire and condemnation of the Obama administration.  As is usual, the White House has now distanced itself from responsibility for the decision to swap the five Taliban prisoners for Sgt. Bergdahl.  Instead, the White House has come out and indicated that the swap deal decision was really made by Secretary Hagel.

Sec. Hagel was quick to fall on his figurative sword draped in myriad excuses and obfuscations.  Hagel became the "good soldier" by accepting responsibility for a decision that had to have come from President Obama.  No one is claiming that Hagel didn't concur with Obama's decision.  Obviously Hagel agreed with Obama's decision to the prisoner swap as Obama's sycophant.  Hagel follows Obama so closely that I suspect his nose is brown from his efforts.

One question comes to my mind over and over again.  What happened to the long standing advertised United States policy not to negotiate with terrorists?  Instead, we are inundated over and over again with the newly enunciated principle of never leaving an American soldier on the battlefield.  The Obama administration is now doing a quick shuffle on the issue of negotiating with terrorists in an absolutely convoluted and tortured logic that goes like this.  According to the Obama administration, the United States did not negotiate with terrorists.  Instead, the United States negotiated with Qatar, which in turn negotiated with the Taliban in Pakistan.  Apparently this makes it all good and proper.  Only in an Alice in Wonderland scenario would anyone buy this delusion, but that doesn't stop the Obama administration from trying to peddle this tripe.

The Obama administration actually proffered this silly excuse with the expectation that the public would buy it, which it hasn't and shouldn't.  Meanwhile, the incompetent Obama administration marches on filled with "good soldiers" willing to fall on their figurative swords to cover the next Obama administration blunder, which is probably right around the corner based upon past performances.  In conclusion, I think the Bergdahl scandal will hang around for some time to come no matter how liberals try to spin it.  I'm guessing the DNC will try to change the narrative to the shocking demise of House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, losing the Virginia Republican Party Primary election to retain his House seat in the next congress beginning in January 2015..

Expect Democrats to jump on this fact to declare that the Republican Party is now in complete chaos and in the throes of being overtaken by the radical rightwing Tea Party faction within the Party.  Further expect that Democrats will once again predict the demise of the Republican Party, pretty much like they have predicted the end of the world, as we know it, through global warming. 

In the end Democrats won't be any more successful in turning the current political narrative to Republican Party chaos, than they have been in convincing people of global warming as a danger to mankind.  However, that won't stop them from trying.

Bergdahl Admitted "Torture" - Validation or Obama's Justification?

By Elizabeth Nelson

Bergdahl is claiming, or I would put it to you - admitting - that he was kept in a "man-made" box for weeks at a time.  The media is spinning this as Obama's Justification to act to free Bergdahl. However, is this proof of torture and validation of Obama’s need to act or proof of claims Bergdahl converted and consorted with the enemy, as FOX's witness claims he had done, during his Jihad against America?

"He’s said that they kept him in a shark cage in total darkness for weeks, possibly months,” one official told the New York Times, adding that the harsh treatment was retribution for at least one escape attempt.

The latest details offer a window into how Bergdahl — who is suspected of having deserted his outpost in June 2009 before disappearing — was treated during his nearly five years in captivity, and, if true, could substantiate some of the motives President Obama has said help justify the controversial trade he signed off on for his freedom. Read more Dailynews:

So, Bergdahl is admitting he was "in a shark cage," because he "attempted to escape," and this would seem to line up with sources that report he did escape twice and was put in a box because of it.  The source also says that their relationship morphed and became one of trust, to the point where he was able to carry a gun and play soccer with them.

The reports indicate that Bergdahl's relations with his Haqqani captors morphed over time, from periods of hostility, where he was treated very much like a hostage, to periods where, as one source told Fox News, "he became much more of an accepted fellow" than is popularly understood. He even reportedly was allowed to carry a gun at times.

The Taliban is claiming they didn't torture him but "we treated him well," documents show that Bergdahl at one point escaped his captors for five days and was kept, upon his re-capture, in a metal cage, like an animal. In addition, the reports detail discussions of prisoner swaps and other attempts at a negotiated resolution to the case that appear to have commenced as early as the fall of 2009. Read more Fox News

The Dr is already coming back with, there is nothing physically wrong with him, other than he has bad teeth and gums, typical of someone that has had a change of diet for the last 5 years. So, tortured, I don't think so, he was their valued guest and friend. Let's try him for no less than desertion and treason at most.

Obama - The Taliban Five May Attack us again - Bologna

By Elizabeth Nelson

Remember when Obama, said, "It’s ‘absolutely’ possible that released prisoners may attack us again"

“In terms of potential threats, the release of the Taliban who were being held in Guantanamo was conditioned on the Qataris keeping eyes on them and creating a structure in which we can monitor their activities. We will be keeping eyes on them."

Is there the possibility of some of them trying to return to activities that are detrimental to us?  Absolutely. That’s been true of all the prisoners that were released from Guantanamo - there’s a certain recidivism rate that takes place.

I wouldn't be doing it if I thought that it was contrary to American national security, and we have confidence that we will be in a position to go after them if in fact they are engaging in activities that threaten our defenses.

But this is what happens at the end of wars.

That was true for George Washington that was true for Abraham Lincoln that was true for FDR. That’s been true of every combat situation. That at some point, you make sure that you try to get your folks back ...and that’s the right thing to do.”  

All this phony on-again-off-again American Patriotism, from a Kenyan occupying president slays me. This idiot really believes that he can just release the five most dangerous men in the world, back into the world and if they happen to fall into that "recidivism rate" and relapse into the terrorism that they wear like an old shoe, he'll what, hit the "reset button" before they attack us?

So, after one of the Taliban Five has already come out saying they are going to kidnap  more Americans and continue their Jihad against Americans, the reaction at the White House of course isn't saying, “Ooops, we made a mistake and we need to 'go after them,'" but instead, "let’s send idiot Kerry out to defend our know-nothing emperor”:


 Kerry strongly defended the decision to recover Bergdahl, amid strong evidence he deserted his post.

"What I know today is what the president of the United States knows, [which is absolutely nothing – except what the hears on [FOX News] it would have been offensive and incomprehensible to consciously leave an American behind, no matter what, to leave an American behind in the hands of people who would torture him, cut off his head, do any number of things," he said. Read more FoxNews

Yet, we left our men do die a violent death in Benghazi and continue to leave two Americans, a Marine in Mexico, and a Pastor in Iran, to be beaten and mistreated? What, no “fake patriotism” Gitmo or Federal Prison exchanges for them? 

What if Waleed M. Shehri; Satam al Suqami; Wail M. Alshehri; Abdu Aziz;  al Omari Fayez Banihammad, Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi; Mohand al Sherhri; Majed Moqed, Salem al Hazmi and Saeed al Ghamdi (all living 9/11 Hijackers) and Osama Bin Laden (if he were still alive today) were on the list of "to be released" for Bowe Bergdahl, would you still be in favor of the release of these prisoners for a [warrior for Islam] deserter?

We all expect the Republicans to come out with justifiable outrage and this lawless Emperor's action, but when even Diane Feinstein (D-CA) comes out and said, "...I strongly believe that we should have been consulted, that the law should have been followed and I very much regret that that was not the case....

Let me help you liberals with Frankenstein's translation; what she's trying to say here, in case you don't get it, we call people who act outside the law criminals.  Obama took a vow "to protect America from enemies foreign and domestic” not to protect the enemy from America.   However, his willful poor decisions have put our country in danger. 

Make no mistake, we will see these men again, when they come back and continue what they started, thanks to this lawless man and his criminal act.

Bergdahl Won't Phone Home

By Kim D.

Even though he is physically fine, for now Bowe Bergdahl will stay in a US military hospital in Germany for treatment. According to NBC News, even though he’s been permitted to talk to his parents, Bergdahl has so far chosen not to call his family in Idaho, the officials said. No specific reason for Bergdahl’s mindstate were given except that he continues treatment for psychological and emotional problems as a result of his five years in captivity.

If Bowe Bergdahl has the slightest clue as to the growing perception of him back home as a traitor/deserter, it's no wonder he would want to postpone his return to face a barrage of questions on his actions five years ago which landed him in captivity. After living with Haqqani for so long and having been tortured and then assimilated into their culture, it's understandable that Bergdahl would have to undergo intense therapy. It does seem odd, however, that he doesn't want to speak with his parents, his biggest champions during this ordeal. Maybe I need to go back to season one of Homeland to gain a better perspective.

Did We Pay a Ransom for Bergdahl's Release?

By Kim D.

In the aftermath of the hasty trade of five of the worst Taliban terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay for one American the Obama administration has called a prisoner of war, questions abound about the legitimacy of this deal and the people who made it. Was Bergdahl a deserter or was he captured? Was his health really in jeopardy, leaving no time to give Congress the required 30-day notice before a prisoner exchange is made? Did Susan Rice flub it again when she claimed Bergdahl served with "honor and distinction?"

Over the weekend, a new question began surfacing: how much did we pay the Haqqanis for Bergdahl's release? Wait a second - Bergdahl was a POW right? Since when is a ransom paid for a prisoner? Things don't quite add up, and the official story coming out of the White House simply isn't passing the smell test. 

According to The Washington Free Beacon, details of the high-profile prisoner swap that freed Bowe Bergdahl . . . are not telling the full story, according to a high-level intelligence official involved in efforts to find and rescue the Army sergeant. The Haqqani Network, a terrorist group operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan, freed Bergdahl on Saturday after holding him captive for five years in exchange for the release of five Guantanamo Bay prison inmates.

A senior intelligence official with intimate knowledge of the years-long effort to locate and rescue Bergdahl told the Washington Free Beacon that the details of that exchange do not add up. The official, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the press, speculated that a cash ransom was paid to the Haqqani Network to get the group to free the prisoner.

The Obama administration reportedly considered offering cash for his release as late as December 2013. The State Department has repeatedly refused to say whether the deal that released Bergdahl involved any cash payment. The ransom plan was reportedly abandoned, but the intelligence official insisted that there is reason to believe that cash changed hands as part of the deal.

“The Haqqanis could give a rat’s ass about prisoners,” the official said, referring to the Haqqani Network, a designated terrorist group in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the five Guantanamo Bay prisoners who were freed in exchange for Bergdahl’s release. “The people that are holding Bergdahl want[ed] cash and someone paid it to them,” he said.

The official cited his work over the course of a decade dealing with hostage situations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Haqqani, he said,“benefits zero from the prisoner exchange. … Based on 10 years of working with those guys, the only thing that would make them move Bergdahl is money.”

Judge Jeanine rips Obama over Bergdahl swap

Jon Stewart Rips on the 'Wonderful' Bergdahl Story

Freed Taliban Prisoner Vows to Fight Americans Again

By Kim D.

It didn't take long for this prediction to come true. The most logical criticism of the recent prisoner swap deal made to bring Bergdahl home is that the Taliban terrorist "dream team" will return to the battlefield to resume the fight against America. And, according to propaganda flowing out of Pakistan, Noorullah Noori, one of the five released Taliban prisoners, has vowed to do just that.

"After arriving in Qatar, Noorullah Noori kept insisting he would go to Afghanistan and fight American forces there,” a Taliban commander told NBC News via telephone from Afghanistan.

Noori pushed to return to Afghanistan after learning that the U.S. had provided written assurances that no country would arrest any of the five freed for a year as long as they lived peacefully, one of his relatives told NBC News by telephone from Afghanistan.

This new revelation makes Dick Cheney's prediction on Kelly File this past Monday night not so far-fetched and should be sending liberal propagandists back to the drawing board to revise tonight's talking points.

Hillary Says "Don't Blame Me" While Kharzi Fumes over Prisoner Swap

By Kim D.

While many Americans are scratching their heads and wondering if the Obama administration is pure evil or simply moronic, Hillary Clinton is patting herself on the back having been one of the early critics of the recent Taliban prisoner swap deal that we now know has been in the works for over three years.  According to The Daily Beast, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was personally and intensely involved in the debate over swapping five Taliban commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in 2011 and 2012. But she had severe reservations about the potential deal, and demanded stricter conditions for the release of the prisoners than what President Obama settled for last week.

For Clinton the prisoner swap only made sense if it was one piece of a series of events that led to a peace process between the Taliban and the Afghan government.  This apparently is a similar sentiment of Afghan President Kharzi who was intentionally left out of the prisoner swap deal and is reportedly outraged.

President Karzai knows how influential these freed Taliban figures are. In his last weeks in office, Karzai wants to achieve some success in his peace negotiation efforts through these Taliban figures. But his chances appear to be slim.

U-S President Barack Obama has been also desperately seeking to engage in peace talks with the Taliban as American troops drawdown has begun, but his efforts have gone no-where at this point. Taliban have refused to make peace and give up the fight so far. It remains to be seen if any peace deal can be reached now that some key Taliban leaders are freed.

White House apologizes for an "Oops!" moment in failing to advise Senate Intel Committee

By Rob Janicki

The White House, in conducting a prisoner exchange of the five highest risk Taliban prisoners for one American soldier in Taliban custody in Afghanistan, is coming up against a violation of law.

The White House has apologized to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) for failing to alert her in advance of a decision to release Taliban commanders from Guantanamo Bay.

Feinstein told reporters that she received a call from Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken on Monday evening apologizing for what the administration is calling an “oversight.”

Was this an "oversight"?  Only an idiot would believe that excuse from the Obama White House.  

The White House has a complete staff of advisers to make certain that there are no "Oops!" moments.  Is it logical or reasonable to believe that the entire White House staff of advisers could have had a singular moment of mass amnesia in forgetting the law that demands the White House inform Congress of such prisoner releases from Gitmo Bay incarceration no less than 30 days from the anticipated change in status of any Gitmo terrorists?  

There are no exceptions written in the law.  There is no wiggle room for the President to use the excuse of "time is of the essence." Obama has clearly overstepped his authority in an illegal act.  Mark this up on the wall with all the other illegal acts Obama has engaged in.  Be prepared for many more similar instances.  

If Republicans manage to capture the Senate with a significant majority beginning in January 2015, they should consider impeachment proceedings.  By then America will have sustained even more financial hardship from Obamacare and all the other Executive Orders and EPA regulations that Obama has managed to essentially incorporate as if these actions were actually law. 

What the White House has done in the instant case of releasing five Taliban terrorists could easily be construed as a standalone, impeachable offense for President Obama. Let's remember that there are no Constitutional or statutory conditions that have to be met for the House of Representatives to bring charges of "high crimes and misdemeanors" against a sitting president.  

It is all dependent upon the process for the House and the Senate to determine what constitutes an impeachable offense.  Basically, anything that a president does that challenges the oath of office to protect and defend the American people and the states of the United States is grounds for bringing charges of impeachment.  

Again, there is no specific law or laws that outline specific crimes that would constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors" as stated in the Constitution.  It is totally dependent upon the entire Congress to determine whether a president has violated his oath of office.

More can be read here.

Delusional Harry Reid Championing Deal to Bring Bergdahl Home

By Kim D.


The Obama deal to trade five top Taliban terrorists for one American held captive for five years in Afghanistan appears to be getting worse. Each day new information comes to light that is quickly proving what a horrible decision this administration has made. Whether this hasty move was to take attention away from the VA Scandal or to escalate an Obama 2008 campaign promise to close Guantanamo Bay, newly released video on the trade shows that Bergdahl is physically healthy and not in the jeopardy Chuck Hagel claimed on Sunday news shows.

So, it's natural that Democrats would begin screaming and running in the opposite direction. Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein is blatantly calling the trade illegal, claiming the administration violated the law by failing to address serious concerns they had about the deal to swap Bergdahl for five Taliban detainees.  Feinstein said, "It comes to us with some surprise and dismay that the transfers went ahead with no consultation, totally not following law . . . and in an issue with this kind of concern to a committee that bears the oversight responsibility, I think you can see that we're very dismayed about it ."

Well - not all Democrats are dismayed.  Harry Reid is twittering away about what a great deal this was. Really Harry? 

When a man or woman puts on the uniform of a U.S. service member, they have America’s uncompromising support.
— Senator Harry Reid (@SenatorReid) June 4, 2014

Well, Harry, when that man or woman dishonors the uniform and deliberately walks away from his or her post in search of the enemy, should America still offer its uncompromising support?

President and his team did exactly what Rs wanted: “Make every effort” to find Bergdahl and bring him home. http://t.co/40U92bNVRy
— Senator Harry Reid (@SenatorReid) June 4, 2014

Presented with all the facts, I wonder how many Republicans wanted Obama to trade the top five "dream team" Taliban terrorists for one American deserter? Hmmmm - keep the propaganda coming Harry.

We rescue our soldiers first and ask questions later. If action by justice system is needed, I prefer American justice over Taliban justice.
— Senator Harry Reid (@SenatorReid) June 4, 2014

Is this kind of like, we pass terrible legislation (Obamacare) and read it later? 

Team Leader Gives His Account of the Night Bergdahl Disappeared

By Kim D. 

It sounds like many of Bergdahl's platoon mates have the same memory of that night five years ago in Afghanistan.  CNN's Jake Tapper interviewed Bergdahl's former team leader, Army Sgt. Evan Buetow, showing yet another veteran firmly believing this was a blatant case of desertion.

State Department Flunky Knows Better than Bergdahl's Platoon? I Doubt it

By Kim D.

Shortly after Bowe Bergdahl's release was announced, one of his former platoon mates Cody Full (@CodyFNfootball) began unleashing his account of what happened in Afghanistan on Twitter. 

On June 30, 2009 @ OP Mest, Paktika Afghanistan @ apprx 0600 local time roll was called. Everyone reported 100% except 3rd squad (my squad)
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

Bravo Team was 100%, Alpha Team wasn't (my team). PVT. Bergdhal was unaccounted for. Searches were conducted on the OP(1/4 acre in size)
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

As Cody Full tweets his memory of this event, he flashes back to when he first met Bergdahl and gives some interesting impressions.

(B) moved in at the Barracks with me and my roomate. All 2nd PLT 3rd Squad but my and B were on Alpha. From the get go something seemed off
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

Normally before war 20 something drink beer, BBQ, hangout with platoon/squad mates on free time, could be your last days you never know
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

B would always stay inside on his bunk reading Rosetta Stone in the 3 languages where we were deploying in Afghan
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

As his story continues, Full addresses some of the issues being used as sympathy for why Bergdahl became disillusioned with his post in Afghanistan and his behavior prior to the night he deserted.

What B was portraying to his family and what was happening in real life were polar opposites
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

We never ran over a child or anybody for that matter. That part really pissed me off.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

During the times @ Mest it is true that B would spend hours with local forces and ask them to translate various things and ask about terrain
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

B packed all his belongings; computer, clothes, random shit,etc. Minus camera and journal.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

Why would someone pack all of there belongings and send them home in the middle of a 12 month deployment? Hmmmm
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) May 31, 2014

Full's memory seems quite clear about what happened after Bergdahl went missing.

Teams were immediately kicked out into surrounding area to look for B. I can't not describe the intensity
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

Our PLT came upon some children, they asked him have they seen an American.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

The children said "yes, he was crawling on his belly through weeds and acting funny a while ago"
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

Villagers said an American did come through the area and was wanting water and someone who spoke English. Wanted to meet with Taliban.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

After that missions starting going off like crazy 17 days straight trying to find B
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

At the end of Cody Full's account of Bergdahl's desertion, he tweets:

Take it as fact or take it as fiction. I just wanted to get some things off my chest.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 1, 2014

Sounds pretty legit, right? Lending more credence to Cody Full's story, Megyn Kelly interviewed him and another platoon mate on Kelly File Monday night. However, on Tuesday, an Obama flunky from the State Department claimed Bergdahl's fellow platoon mates were not reliable sources, basically calling them liars.



I don't know who this chick is (and it doesn't really matter), but I'm taking the word of an honorable veteran who was serving in Afghanistan five years ago when Bergdahl decided he was disgusted with America and wanted to switch to the Taliban team.

This is not a political issue. This is strictly getting the truth out on what happened, B knowingly and planned to desert his fellow men.
— _ (@CodyFNfootball) June 2, 2014

Dr. Common Sense on Susan Rice's Latest Lies

He might not know Bergdahl's name, but he's got everything else right. Enjoy!

Donald Trump "Bergdahl - Terrorist Prisoner Exchange is a Terrible Deal"

By Elizabeth Nelson

Bergdahl is no hero, the war on terror has new renewed life, and Donald Trump is weighing in on the subject.  Through this whole experience, I can't help but remember 9/11 and those two planes as they crashed into tower one and then tower two. We were so angry and then so sad. What a waste of life, it didn't have to happen. Islamic Terrorist opened our eyes and brought the war to our soil. Yet how quickly we have forgotten who the enemy is, and how much they not only hate us, but want to annihilate us. 

Complacency kills, don't turn a blind eye, friend, five of their most efficient soldiers and killing machines are free once more, thanks to Obama and the Bergdahls. As patriotic Americans, it's by our nature, when we see the words "American," "POW" and "Homecoming" we get all warm and fuzzy and are quick to throw out words like Patriot and Hero, and usually for good reason, but what if I threw this quote at you, would you still be quick to toss around those words so freely?

“I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.” Oh, wait, it gets better.

“The future is too good to waste on lies, and life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be American. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting.”  Emails to Bergdahl's parents, reported by the late Michael Hastings, this was sent before he went AWOL and walked off base in nothing but his civilian clothing.

Americans who love their country, to me are Americans and Patriots, but Americans who desert their country are traitors and enemies of the state.  We don't continue calling men who turn into women men, right?  This man was a traitor to his country long before six men gave their lives to try to save him and the Taliban welcomed him into their camp and called him one of their own, and then made a deal with the devil, to free five of the most dangerous men we have ever seen, and will see again, when they come to seek their revenge.

It has already been speculated by some in this administration that Bowe Bergdahl won't receive a day of punishment for going AWOL or being the cause of six men dying. I do not believe that he was a prisoner of the Taliban, their prisoners wear the bruises, and are skin and bones, but rather he was their special guest.


He and his father are Muslims. His father was allowed to disrespect America, calling for all the prisoners of Gitmo to be released, which would continue to put more soldiers and American lives at risk and then added insult to injury by praising Allah in the Rose Garden; the god that hates America and her people.


These people are enemies to America. Yet, these are the people that will be invited to the White House and probably have a banquet in his honor. This is a slap in the face of every one of our troops. Bowe’s actions, in time will prove who he is; time always tells all, his father has already proven to be an ass. What more proof does the rest of the country need to prove that Obama is a Muslim and is deliberately destroying our country in every way possible and putting our Country’s very security at risk?


Even Donald Trump weighed in on the "now we negotiate with terrorists," Bergdahl - Terrorist Prisoner Exchange. This is a man that knows a lot about business deals and human nature, and he’s seen it all and Trump said Monday that the “terrible” deal for the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl puts other American soldiers in harm’s way.

“It’s a terrible deal we made, a terrible deal,” Trump told “Fox & Friends” during an interview on Monday morning. “Every soldier and every American is at risk now.”

On Saturday, President Barack Obama announced that the last U.S. captive in Afghanistan had been set free. Bergdahl, 28, was handed over to the U.S. in exchange for the release of five Afghan detainees in custody at the U.S. prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

“I think it’s going to turn out to be one catastrophe,” said Trump, the author of “The Art of the Deal.” “They think they’re doing it for political reasons; I think it will end up being a political nightmare.”

Watch Video Here

He added, “It’s the gang that can’t shoot straight, that’s our leadership. But you can’t do this, you can’t set this kind of precedent and it puts every American soldier and actually every American in danger. There is no question about it, this is a horrible trade.”

Trump is not the first to question this deal. On Sunday, Rep. Adam Kinzinger said that the trade-off was “shocking” on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and Sen. John McCain labeled the release of Gitmo prisoners as “disturbing” on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

National Security Adviser Susan Rice and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel have both stood by the decision to release five prisoners in exchange for Bergdahl on Sunday talk shows, but Trump, a negotiation expert, says that the Obama administration needs to brush up on its skills. Read more Politico: